Sample Healthcare Paper on Structures in Healthcare

Fundamentally, structures in healthcare describe how different facilities can conduct task coordination activities, supervision, and task allocation among other important functions. Indeed, understanding the planning, organization, and structuring of healthcare can enable the personnel to facilitate the provision of competent and quality services to clients (Fallon, Begun, & Riley, 2013). In contemporary settings, centralized structures are becoming more fundamental in defining various management roles and improving clinical experiences. Some of these structures include client-centered structures, organic structures, informal hierarchies, and social networks. Accordingly, in this paper, the primary objective will include providing accurate description of the impact of the stipulated structures that are fundamental in healthcare systems.

Client-Centered Structures

A client-centered structure focuses on offering treatment or primary care to clients. The structure encourages the use of knowledge based on patients’ innate values and personal priorities facing the patients. Healthcare using this structure should take time analyzing their patients to facilitate the development of better strategies necessary in improving the overall quality of care (Fallon, Begun, & Riley, 2013). Fundamentally, developing and implementing a client-centered approach will allow healthcare facilities to assume greater responsibility over various treatment decisions.

Positive Impact

            A client-centered structure can empower clients, promote autonomy, and encourage self-determination in various healthcare facilities. Furthermore, the system is crucial in the development of effective treatment plans and recovery processes or procedures. A client-centered can reflect the innate values crucial in improving organizational engagements and encouraging the participation of patients in their respective treatment processes. Besides, the structure recognizes the importance of the clients’ socio-cultural, spiritual, medical, and psychological wellbeing and needs (Rowe, 2017). Another positive impact of this structure is that it can encourage the development of relevant intervention strategies to minimize possible harms to clients. Lastly, a client-centered structure can encourage patients to express their self-identified needs and choices furthermore facilitating the provision of effective care services.

Negative Impact

Nonetheless, while client-centered structure can ensure the development of an effective doctor-patient relationship and the provision of individualized care, it has certain serious disadvantages. For instance, it can limit patients’ inputs in the provision of primary care among other important relationships (Rowe, 2017). Another negative impact is the incorporation of multiple steps in the provision of effective care procedures.

Organic Structures

Organic structures refer to a flexible system of management capable of encouraging positive adaptation of desirable changes. This structure promotes a typical pyramid of leadership that incorporates both senior level healthcare professionals and management team. The structure is relevant in healthcare facilities with many staff working in horizontal clusters (Fallon, Begun, & Riley, 2013). Likewise, it encourages the decentralization of power through participative decision-making frameworks toward the delivery of effective care processes.

Positive Impact

The structure can facilitate the free flow of information between various healthcare stakeholders. For instance, physicians can ensure an effective flow of instructions and guidance to nurses and other coordinates on relevant care processes. Through such effective communication processes, this type of structure can ensure efficiency in the delivery of relevant care practices (Jones, 2013). The structure can promote teamwork by encouraging the sharing of information among healthcare professionals with diversified skills and competency levels. Organic structure can support the development of specialized teams within care settings to ensure independent and responsible execution of assign tasks. It discourages close supervision among the professionals and emphasizes on job specialization to ensure adaptability to the dynamic health environments. Higher sense of responsibility implies an increased in efficiency and strategic control of essential care procedures. Lastly, organic structures is relevant in environments with highly trained and empowered personnel capable of handling the changing nature of diseases and other related challenges.

Negative Impact

The high number of personnel working under this care implies ineffective coordination of important processes. Organic structure can limit effective supervision of treatment processes further influencing the effective delivery of appropriate care. The structure stressed on participative decision-making processes further making it hard to determine the most viable treatment processes (Jones, 2013). The higher number of personnel further imply rising costs of administration to cater for staff remuneration among other expenditures. Another negative impact of organic structure is the difficulty in predicting the working processes given the constantly changing healthcare environments. Lastly, the structure can result in serious misunderstandings among the stipulated professional on the appropriate care processes further making it hard to develop good working environments or cooperation.

Informal Hierarchies

            Informal hierarchies refer to structures used in interlocking social structures and developing personal relationships and mutually beneficial social networks. The hierarchies can support positive interactions between healthcare professionals through various social and friendly teams. Developing such networks can promote the emotional, psychological, and physical satisfaction among patients (Fallon, Begun, & Riley, 2013). The existence of informal structures in healthcare facilities can further promotion the development of common interest and motivate relevant professionals to concentrate on effective delivery of desired health in a calm and comfortable environment.

Positive Impact

The creation of information structures is automatic and do not require massive investment from the management of healthcare entities. As a low-cost managerial option, healthcare professionals can rely on the structure to improve friendly interactions between various important stakeholders such as patients and clients. Furthermore, the structure promotes flexibility in decision-making processes given that it does not have a designated pattern or flow of information and direction making it easy to communicate with key stakeholders (Krackhardt, 2014). Fast communication, ability to fulfill social needs, and accurate feedback mechanisms among other psychological and social benefits are other important features of hierarchical structures.

Negative Impact

The structure can encourage the spread of inaccurate information on treatment-related decisions risking the life of patients. The lack of a clear or distinctive structure of information makes it possible to spread such misleading information. Therefore, informal structures do not support smooth or efficient working processes within healthcare organizations (Krackhardt, 2014). The impact of such disintegrated systems includes inability to implement policies and important changes that may influence important patient management processes. Lastly, while informal structures stresses on patients’ satisfaction among other individual interests, it pays little attention to organizational interests and wellbeing.

Social Networks

A social network refers to a unique organizational structure comprising of a set of social actors or stakeholders responsible for the efficient delivery of assigned tasks. Social networks are crucial in healthcare settings in the encouraging distinctive and stable arrangement of societal interactions and institutions (Fallon, Begun, & Riley, 2013). Notably, social networks in healthcare emphasizes on understanding how factors such as the family, religion, socio-economic dynamics, and political affiliations can influence the delivery of services. Lastly, social networks focus on the unique application of values, integration of groups and institutions, effective organizations of activities, collectivities, specific roles, and norms in healthcare environments.

Positive Impact

Social networks can promote peaceful division or classification of responsibilities and tasks with healthcare systems. In such systems, individuals can attain higher level of social dignity through positive interactions and mutually benefiting relationships. For instance, patients can study and understand patients’ beliefs, norms, and important practices that are pertinent to them. Without such information, the professionals may fail to provide relevant care and services to clients (Milroy & Llamas, 2013).  Through such social networks, organizations can analyze their patterns of service delivery to identify possible challenges, unique strengths, and possible areas of improvements. Fundamentally, social networks incorporate various structural theoretical processes in developing social and behavioral responses to different situations. Undeniably, including social network structures in healthcare analytics can provide relevant models that can facilitate the communication between patients and healthcare provides. Accordingly, social networks ensure stability and contentment within such environments (Milroy & Llamas, 2013). The social structure can further encourage professionals in to ensure social stability while executing their responsibilities.

Negative Impact

The structure is prone to social disorganization or misunderstanding. For instance, a healthcare professional may develop negative attitudes towards the patients’ innate beliefs or racial affiliation. Such negative perceptions may influence the ability to delivery objective services further limiting the efficiency of social networks in healthcare settings (Milroy & Llamas, 2013). Furthermore, diversity in social affiliations may cause disunity between individuals. For instance, doctor may fail to attend to an individual with contradicting values and this may endanger the life of the patient.

Conclusion

The primary purpose of this paper was to provide an accurate description of the impact of the various structures that are fundamental in promoting different operations in healthcare systems. The paper gave detailed information on the positive and negative impacts of client-centered structures, organic structures, informal hierarchies, and social networks. Indeed, the identified networks play a significant role in the delivery of different healthcare services.

 

 

References

Fallon, L. F., Begun, J. W., & Riley, W. J. (2013). Managing health organizations for quality and performance. Jones & Bartlett Publishers.

Jones, G. R. (2013). Organizational theory, design, and change. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson,.

Krackhardt, D. (2014). Graph theoretical dimensions of informal organizations. In Computational organization theory (pp. 107-130). Psychology Press.

Milroy, L., & Llamas, C. (2013). Social networks. The handbook of language variation and change, 407-427.

Rowe, W. S. (2017). Client-centered theory and the person centered approach: Values-based, evidence-supported. Social work treatment: Interlocking theoretical approaches, 34.