Public Administration Paper on South Carolina’s Infrastructure

South Carolina’s Infrastructure

By 2017, the U.S. had witnessed significant infrastructural developments. However, South Carolina, as a state, still experienced infrastructural challenges. For instance, 10.3 percent of the bridges were found to be structurally deficient, and around 178 dams within South Carolina were declared high potential hazards. As such, the purpose of this paper is to propose a policy plan on the South Carolina’s infrastructure funding.

Internal and External Environments

The policy plan is set to carry out its activities in the existing environment. This means that the environment, both internal and external, will play a crucial role in the plan’s process. The internal environment entails various factors such as financial planning, structures, human resources, and technology. On the other hand, the external environment turns out to be uncontrollable, and as such, the policy plan may need to effectively relate to these external environmental factors to ensure effectiveness (Stucki, 2009). The external environment comprises factors such as political, socio-cultural, and economic factors.

Effects of the Environments on Policy Plan Success

For the effectiveness of the policy plan, the effects of environmental factors must be considered. Regarding the internal factors, financial planning plays an integral role in the management of the policy. This factor focuses on the financial flows of the policy plan and the impacts or consequences that may result in the South Carolina’s state investing in different infrastructural projects. The planning will enable the state to avoid wastage of available funds. Also, technology improves the accuracy of the plan by providing data that is of importance to South Carolina State in making effective decisions. Besides, technology enables the collection of data from both the internal and external sources. Regarding the effects of external environmental factors to my policy plan, political factors such as corruption may see competitors bribe the federal government barring infrastructural funding (Stucki, 2009). Poor management of funds by some officials may hinder the allocation of funds to various projects as highlighted in the policy plan. Also, in the economic environment, variables such as liberalization could affect the success of the policy plan.

Various Benefits of Implementing A Change Through the Public Policy Issue

Implementation of this policy plan will be of importance to the people of South Carolina and the state government as well. The state will fund its projects on its own rather than depending on the federal funds. Furthermore, the state government will make the maintenance of the roads a priority for fast road transport activities. The state’s independent funding of its projects may avoid the sudden disruptions that often result from the delay of the federal governments funding. Also, the state government will focus on the production of clean energy. The state government will budget its funds on the creation of renewable energy to increase the efficiency in the production and distribution of clean energy within the state (Puentes & Thompson, n.d.). Before the project may begin, various ethical considerations such as observing the global standards when putting up different infrastructures, as well, the sensitivity of cultural and social differences of the diverse people in the state should be appreciated.

Overall, the policy plan will be of importance to South Carolina’s state government when implemented. Successful outcomes of this policy depend on the establishment of effective infrastructure by the state government.





Puentes, R., & Thompson, J. (n.d). Banking on Infrastructure. Retrieved from

Stucki, A. (2009). Internal and External Factors Influencing the Implementation and Diffusion of the Open Innovation Models: The Case of the Postal Sector. In 3rd Global Postal Research and Education Network Conference (No. MIR-CONF-2009-009). Retrieved from