International Relations Essay on Gender Perspectives on the US Military Intervention in Afghanistan

Gender Perspectives on the US Military Intervention in Afghanistan

Women-centered perspective on the US military intervention in Afghanistan is considerably different from that of men. While the concern of women is centered on fleeing from their homes to be secure, men are more sensitive on who is taking part in the war and violence. For women, the removal of the Taliban does not amount to liberation. They do not value the promise of democracy. All they need is peace, which they can derive from living in their homes, both geographically and as a mental construct, which if often targeted and destroyed by foreigners and locals during war and conflict, mainly as an instrument of spreading fear and intimidation. Although the home is important to men and women, it is mostly identified with the women because of their historical role in the making of a home. Apart from physical implications, the destruction of the home and community greatly affects women’s primary identity of the self, culture, and the sense of belonging, which ultimately affects their creativity, interpersonal relationship, and world-view. While battlefields as open or public spaces are associated with, women are often associated with the home and family as private spheres that are perceived as being outside the range of war.

The gender distinction can be useful in formulating an international relations theory. There is a need to recognize the home in international politics as a basic unit of analysis, rather than focusing only on the nationwide state. The reason for this as demonstrated above is that the home is integral to state formation and its continuation. It is evident that a state’s foundation of social life is built entirely upon the construct of the home. It influences one’s self concept, identity, creativity, interpersonal relationships, and one’s world-view, which collectively influence international politics and relations.