History Paper on Facts or Memoirs
I ended my career in politics in 1965 after I retired from an official position in the government. The following is a memoir I decided to draft after conducting a research on scientific reports to advice the president on the best option to select. As a confidential advisor, I informed President Harry S. Truman to embrace option three. Through this advice, he would be convinced to delay use of bomb pending. The effectiveness of this option would be apparent when the Japanese would be forced to surrender the battle (Morton 39).
I was essential to delay the use of atomic bomb on Japan to avoid triggering war. Clearly, this action could be attributed by aspects such as memory of cold war, emotions and ignorance. In this regard, United States had to go for the option of dropping use of bombs. Their purpose of embracing this step was to impress the Russians and not to put the world war to an end.
Evidently, the choice of delaying use of bombs by Americans could save Japanese islands from being attacked. This cancellation was also vital to pay way for exhibition that was to be conducted at Washington DC specifically at the Air and Space Museum. This display will depict how Enola Gay would reveal his nose. It was also to indicate the manner in which Japan defended them against the US imperialism. In addition, use of bombs was unnecessary because it would subject a lot of people to lose their lives and properties.
For instance, if America could have invaded Kyushu region in Japan, this could have coasted them a total of 150,000 deaths in Japan. Clearly, this figure was not inclusive of the 100,000 captives who were allied in Japan. This was after the vice minister in Japan had already issued their death order via available means. It was to happen when Americans soldiers decided to step in Japan and attack them. By 1965, Truman was still undecided if he could use atomic bombs to invade Japan.
The order of the President in relation to FDR and captivity of Japanese Americans came after president Roosevelt decided to sign an agreement in 1942. Based on security reasons, this treaty facilitated eradication of American citizens and Japanese Aliens to be locked up in their camps. This was under their guard’s supervision (Robinson 92). Evaluating the FDR outlook in the decisive years, it led to the perception that individuals of Japanese origin who stayed in America could be threatening and foreign.
Based on these harmful sentiments and styles of leadership, it made Roosevelt to approve extraordinary mistreatment among citizens in America. His intervention on the matter was essential to determine the duration, nature and outcome of leadership policy that was under confinement. It was clear that the president’s order revealed the manner in which a great humanitarian ruler and his advisors became part of the battle to enhance democracy. However, this war was unjust because it could have made Americans to embrace a policy that was undemocratic towards its own citizens.
This reminds us of the president’s authority and belief to control and verify on the public policy. In addition, the perception of the president on this matter was to encourage citizens to be vigilant. This was significant to ensure that all the rights of citizens were safeguarded against all forms of potential battles.
The decision on whether President Truman could use atomic bombs to attack Japan was a form of justification to put the battle to an end. Its relevance was to save the countless lives of both Japanese and the Americans. Historically, the facts on delaying the use of bombs could be effective as the major option to prevent Americans from losing the battle. This option was also essential to avoid indiscriminating civilians through mass bombings. This could only be accomplished by dropping use of atomic bombs on Nagasaki and Hiroshima. The delay of using atomic bomb led to an occasion that united citizens to form an association to abolish nuclear weapons.
It is a fact to reveal that if Americans could render use of atomic bombs pending; this could contribute to a situation that could surrender Japanese to surrender the battle. This is because it could contribute to massacre of citizens and in human crimes that are associated with indiscrimination. In this regard, Americans were supposed to abolish use of nuclear weapons. This was attributed to a view that will convince Japanese government to increase the pressure to identify its own crimes in war (Morton 65). Furthermore, delay of war was also essential to enable leaders in Japan to divert their attention from their own crimes that could facilitate war.
This could only be accomplished when Japanese leaders assumed taking responsibility of victims in atomic bombing to avoid losing lives and properties. The use of bombs was not necessary because it could not facilitate triumph in the battle. There was need to delay bombing because it incorporated powerful weapons that could force Japan to surrender the battle. Clearly, the US military decided to use nuclear weapons to bomb Hiroshima on August 6, and later invaded Nagasaki on August 9. This became effective because the following day, Japanese revealed signs to surrender the battle. As a result, it became difficult to evaluate the decision by Japanese to give up objectively in relation to entire bomb incident.
Historically, this move by Americans to bomb the two regions in Japan was vital because it enabled their Supreme Council to meet and discus about the unconditional surrender. During this time, Great Britain and United States had already convened trials in war crimes to happen in Europe. The fact that even if the Japan leaders had surrendered, they were not ready to give up their beliefs and traditions (Walker 115). The news about the bombing incident accessed leaders in Japan after they had finished meeting with the Supreme Council. The president arranged another meeting with his members to find ways of handling the issue. In this regard, the response of President Truman about the bombing situation was clear when he called upon his top political advisors and the military to discuss how they could tackle the matter.
- Results of Russia’s pending declaration of war on Japan
Evaluating on the outcome of Russia’s pending declaration of war on Japan, it is clear that the war between the Russian and Japan Empire started 8, February, 1904 up to 5, September; 1905.The major theatres of operations were the Liaodong peninsula and Mukden in southern Manchuria. This also took place within and the seas in Korea after they sought a warm water port on the Pacific Ocean for the navy and trade.
The result of this delay in battle is that it made Vladivostok to take an in summer seasons in the entire year. Through the threats that were depicted by the Russian expansion, Japan offered to recognize Russian dominance in Manchuria. This was in exchange for recognition of Korea as being the sphere of influence. The Japanese government perceived a Russian threat to its strategic interests and chose to go to war. As a result, Russia suffered a lot of numerous defeats by Japan. However, Tsar Nicholas 11 was convinced that Russia would win and decided to remain in the war .The results transformed the balance of power in East Asia resulting in a reassessment of Japan’s recent entry onto the world.
The Russian-Japanese war resulted in a Japanese victory and the treaty of Portsmouth. This incorporated the later events that revolved around the Mukden incident and Japanese invasion of Manchuria. In regard to this situation, Japan eventually gained control over Korea. In the late 1930s, there were a number of soviet-Japanese border incident. The most significant was the battle of Lake Kazan (Robinson 59). The neutrality pact freed up forces from the border incident. This further enabled the soviet to concentrate on the war with Germany.
Conversely, the Japanese had to concentrate on their southern expansion into Asia and the Pacific Ocean. Due to these operations, the soviet made it a policy to intern allied air crews who landed in soviet territory. They also decided that they did not wish to renew the neutrality pact. This was because, its rules requires that it take 12 months before its expiry. In 1945, they informed the Japanese that they did not wish to renew the treaty. Te reason is that it made Japanese to be considerable concerning the assurance from the soviet.
It revealed that the treaty would be still in force for another twelve months to avoid worry. On 9th may 1945, Germany surrendered meaning that the soviet was to honor the Yalta agreement but the situation continued to deteriorate for the Japanese. Clearly, they were only axis power left in the war. The soviets did nothing to discourage the Japanese’s hopes and drew the process out.
In late June, they approached the soviet inviting them to negotiate peace with the allies. This pending declaration of war also facilitated support to Japan by providing them with good proposals. Its results were also clear when it offered the soviet attractive territorial concessions. Finally Japanese were caught completely by surprise when the soviet declared the war an hour before midnight.
- Results of continued bombing and naval blockade
The outcome of continued bombing activity further revealed various turn out of events. This was evident when the treaty would still be in force for another twelve months to avoid worry. On 9th may 1945, Germany surrendered, meaning that the soviet was to honor the Yalta agreement. However, this situation continued to deteriorate for the Japanese. Clearly, they were only axis power left in the war (Walker 85). The soviets did nothing to discourage the Japanese’s hopes and drew the process out.
Later, effects on the naval blockade was witnessed when they was the pending declaration of war. This made the soviet to invite them to negotiate peace with it’s the allies. This pending declaration of war also facilitated support to Japan by providing them with good proposals. Its results were also clear when it offered the soviet attractive territorial concessions. Finally Japanese were caught completely by surprise when the soviet declared the war an hour before midnight.
Works Cited
Morton, Louis. “The Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb.” Foreign Affairs. (1957). Print.
www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/1957-01-01/decision-use-atomic-bomb. Accessed 15, October 2016.
Robinson, Greg. By Order of the President: Fdr and the Internment of Japanese Americans. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 2001. Internet resource.
http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674011182. Accessed 15, October 2016.
Walker, J S. Prompt and Utter Destruction: Truman and the Use of Atomic Bombs against Japan. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2004. Print.
https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/imh/article/view/11695/17097. Accessed 15, October 2016.