Healthcare Paper on Sin Tax on Unhealthy Foods
The article Six Controversial Reasons a Sin Tax Could Apply on Junk Food depicts six detailed explanations concerning tax imposed on unhealthy food. The article describes the way sin taxes apply on commodities such as foods with high-calorie content, alcohol, sugary foods, and cigarettes. The taxes can be used to advance the public health condition. This move would also generate the high revenue required to promote public health. Therefore, Leech suggests that taxes on tobacco as well as alcohol have a high impact on the improvement of the health sector. Furthermore, the current health benefits support the move to tax unhealthy foods, however, the end result is an increase in the cost of commodities such as sugar. The government on the other hand fears it would affect the consumption of unhealthy foods due to taxation. The article also adds that junk foods taxation is practical in other regions such as Denmark and it is working well. However, the government needs money that can be raised through sin tax of junk food.
My position concerning the topic under discussion is that the government should add a sin tax on the foods regarded as unhealthy. In my point of view, this can be achieved if the government comes up with new policies to develop healthcare institutions. Consequently, introduction of sin tax would increase the Junk food prices and limit consumers so that they can balance their consumption with healthy foods. Accordingly, taxing unhealthy foods is something that has been carried out for a long time in other regions such as Denmark; turning out successful and therefore, adopting the sin tax in United States would generate more tax from the commodities.
“6 Controversial Reasons A ‘Sin Tax’ On Junk Food Could Work.” 6 Controversial Reasons A
“Sin Tax” On Junk Food Could Work | Care2 Causes. N.p., n.d. Web. 04 June 2017.