Essay on Should Government Invest More Money In Building Shelter House?

Should Government Invest More Money In Building Shelter House?

Shelter is a basic requirement for human survival, and no one can contentedly live without a good house. Majority of the state and non-governmental institutes go through extensive operation to protect their people from the impacts of being homeless (Australia, 2012, p.93). Nevertheless, lack of shelter is still a core issue for most of the nations globally, as well as forces itself into the social system of the community. Essentially, there are two kinds of shelters and they are semi-permanent and permanent or temporary shelter. The nature of shelter that a certain community holds shows its social as well as financial situations.

In contrast, social culture commands the kind of shelter that a certain community builds. This unique way of sheltering is seen diversely from social as well as ethnic settings. In this respect, modernization and civilization accentuate on a standard shelter model. Being not able to satisfy these thresholds is seen as underdevelopment. Australia is never exempt to lack of housing, more so amongst Aborigines. As a result, the question stood, whether the state ought to put more funds in constructing shelter houses, is perfect. Homelessness is described here on the viewpoints that incorporate insecurity, lack of connections as well as protection in that provided setting, leading to homelessness.  The Australian government need to actually work on measures to control the increasing impacts of homelessness. This statement is vindicated depending on a number of reasons.

The government ought to work hard to get rid of the issues that many people experience in the nation. Homelessness as a social crisis has exposed the populace to massive difficulties in their lives. Actually, the state need to act fast to build ample homes for the millions of homeless Australians. The initial motive is connected to the monetary capability of population (Kennedy, & De Roos, 2005, p.143). Majority of the manual worker households have lesser incomes, and barely satisfy their basic requirements. These incomes are quite low, to scope that individuals are pushed to build temporary as well as makeshift shelters. This problem has caused several instances of homelessness being faced in the nation. As a result, the state need to find a housing plan that attempts to promote the rates of constructing these shelters. These days, majority of the Australians do not have serene houses, and are probable to live like this. An economical difficulty in the nation negatively affects the population, who have to face great sufferings. This is the initial highlight that spurs the state to take part in home building, for fear that the people will go on staying in social outskirts. Easy to understand shelter strategies by the state are probable to bring change on the social condition of the populace.

The government of Australia need to improve its housing scheme to culminate several social as well as ancient gaps in the nation. Intergenerational poverty in this nation is one of the problems that causes inadequate housing amenities (Commonwealth Parliamentary Association, 2010, p.74). In the past account, numerous individuals owning up to diverse ethical backgrounds have gone through the vice of social segregation as well as downgrading. The outcome of this exercise is severe poverty. For example, natives of Aboriginal origin have gone through the effects of social discernment, which has led to widespread poverty among them.

This is what has been referred to as generational poverty, and it can culminate by adjusting to sturdy social and Proofreading-Editingprogressive frameworks. The only means to ease these circumstances is by spurring the socially deprived people. On top of this, the Aborigines have a developmental historical background of not having safe as homes and shelter amenities. The start of financial underdevelopment in this nation commences with the impacts of generationally inherited poverty. For this reason, the Australian government needs to establish widespread undertakings to leverage these individuals from their social challenges and backups. With the building of houses, the Aborigines, amongst many other social-segregated people, will be motivated as well as adapt to modernism.

Lack of conformity flanked by several homes as well as the number of people puts the nation to widespread lack of shelters. This is the other reason the state needs to deal with the issue via building sustainable homes for the population (Australia, 2003, p.88). Congestion causes formation of slums as well as unsafe settlements. These settlements are certain to cause several problems to the population, who usually have to face deprived living situations. Culmination of the housing problem in the nation can solitary be possible if the state takes part in the building of many houses. Presently, majority of the Australians lack shelters or are living in deprived houses. These place fail to provide a serene living setting, and occasionally cause most of the situations in the city. Issues with urbanization commence with the institution of deprived settlements. Progressions of social wrongdoing in cities are vastly linked to the deprived living situations. For example, fiscal and social disparity is vastly evident where there are huge inequalities amongst social divisions. This is a severe issue that need to be dealt with significantly, for dread that the community disintegrates into acute social as well as financial collapse. Governmental projects on homelessness need to take measures, as well as make sure that no individual is exposed to poor life. Actually, the social feedback of individual towards the poor situation is quite low as well as destructive. Under usual situation, individuals who are inspired try to be financially active and socially visible. This is the policy that the state needs to embrace to build more shelters so as to end the generational poverty as well as injustices.

Regardless of the attempts to have more houses for the population, the procedure need to be dealt with care and contemplation.  In the instance of Australia, the population of Aborigine origins are alleged to be vastly stuck to their ethnic and moral roots. These individuals exercise nomadic ways of life and hold no places of long-term dwelling (Ryan, 2006, p.124). As a result, the consequences of building many houses may include great loss to the state. A good example is where, it is expensive to build a permanent home for a nomad who has to travel now and then. A full nomadic lifestyle does not back a stable way of life. This is another motive that must be looked at prior to government’s investment on this group of people. Nevertheless, this statement is still a myth, as it has no sturdy evidence.

Based on the prevalent helpful facts, it is suitable for the Australian government to capitalize more on constructing houses. Fine housing amenities present a great ending to social inequality as well as generational poverty. The state is obligated to establish exceptional ways of life for its population, as well as inspire their social status. This is one way that the nation can stay financially stable and accountable in the start of modernism. On top of this, long-term investment by employers, who actually have lesser revenue, is exceptionally characterized in the subsidized settlement projects via these houses (Conroy, 2007, p.45). At last, the procedure of putting funds in permanent houses need to be pursued carefully to disrupt any likely consequences on the populations. For instance, nomadic challenges need to be apprehended prior to the state investing in housing. With these facets considered by the state, it is easy for the people to progress as well as adjust to modernism.

We are not only quality writers but also affordable homework helpers. At Essays Experts
, we do not exploit you through exorbitant prices. Here, we offer the best and competitive prices in the market, as we understand your financial needs. When you come to us, you save money to meet your others needs.



Australia. (2003). Parliamentary debates, House of Representatives, weekly Hansard. Canberra, By Authority.

Australia. (2012). Australian foreign affairs record. Canberra, Australian Govt. Pub. Service].

Commonwealth Parliamentary Association. (2010). The Parliamentarian; Journal of the parliaments of the Commonwealth.

Conroy, J. D. (2007). Shelter for the homeless: Asian-Pacific needs and Australian responses. Canberra, ACFOA.

Kennedy, D., De Roos, D., & De Roos, D. (2005). The insider’s guide to real estate investing loopholes. Hoboken, NJ, John Wiley.{28595963-C7D9-49BC-A223-E15F87FFE4C9}&Format=410.

Ryan, D. S. (2006). America: a guide to the experience. London, UK, Kozmik Press.