Working memory is significantly associated with academic achievement; hence, even a minimal WM capacity can have a substantial impact on general mental operations as well as acquisition of skills and knowledge for the process of learning (Peng & Fuchs, 2016). WM varies between persons in relation to the amount of information that retained and how information is efficiently processed. As such, WM enables one to retain material for a short period and work with it in the meanwhile (Bergman & Söderqvist, 2017).
Conversely, educational opportunities are hindered when individuals fail to accomplish tasks due to forgetting or improperly remembering content critical to the learning process (Connor, Alberto, Compton & O’Connor, 2014). Additionally, students with WM insufficiency face challenges with responsibilities that require both storage and recovery of information, face difficulties in holding their place during tasks, and are weak at observing the outcomes of their activities and usually need assistance in the classroom (Redick et al., 2015). Kids affected by this kind of disorder easily get distracted and face difficulties in recalling and following directives. Similarly, students with literacy challenges indicate intense impairment in the central executive and phonological loop, but not in the visuospatial circle (Malekpour, Aghababaei & Abedi, 2013).
Students affected by impairment of WM capacity are likely to experience lack of focus when involved in activities that require cognitive engagement (Gathercole et al., 2016). For instance, these children may find it a challenge parsing the material necessary for all cerebral operations due to a burdened WM. Significantly, students experiencing a WM deficit face difficulties in determining written texts, which can thus hamper reading comprehension (Booth, Boyle & Kelly, 2014).
As such, academic success is affected by the student’ WM aptitude and those displaying poor WM commonly attain low grades in tasks such as reading and math. Further, inadequate WM negatively impacts the attainment of foundational skills such as interpreting words and reading interpretation (Melby-Lervåg & Hulme, 2013). Scholars suffering from WM lapse face difficulties in being alert during lessons as they tend to forget information quicker compared to their peers (Miller et al., 2013).
Consequently, it is evident from numerous studies that kids with literacy difficulty indicates severe cognitive impairments in the central executive and the phonological loop but not on the visuospatial sketchpad. As such, these children tend to portray various limitations on their learning process such as intense spelling mistakes leading to poor academic grades (Carretti, Caldarola, Tencati & Cornoldi, 2014). Additionally, low working memory among juveniles with education disorder has been associated with poor language comprehension, finding solutions to a given problem, and fluid intelligence. Significantly, teens with inadequate WM conveys a challenge in getting started on various classroom assignment since their WM have been overloaded with all the instructions they have obtained.
Importantly, children with poor working memory are usually slow to copy things down from the board since they find it cumbersome to remember more than one or two words at the same time, thus, the need to frequently check and recheck the initial sentence (Brandenburg et al., 2015). Significantly, the kids normally have a problem in answering questions or being involved in class discussions as they might have forgotten part or all the questions. Therefore, they are always not sure if some of the informative materials they are volunteering to reply have already been discussed or have forgotten about the topic being deliberated (Dirk & Schmiedek, 2017). As such, they normally miss out on new information that is communicated because they are still trying to recall the essential thing mentioned earlier.
Bergman Nutley, S., & Söderqvist, S. (2017). How is working memory training likely to influence academic performance? Current evidence and methodological considerations. Frontiers in Psychology, 8 69.
Booth, J. N., Boyle, J. M., & Kelly, S. W. (2014). The relationship between inhibition and working memory in predicting children’s reading difficulties. Journal of Research in Reading, 37(1), 84-101.
Brandenburg, J., Klesczewski, J., Fischbach, A., Schuchardt, K., Büttner, G., & Hasselhorn, M. (2015). Working memory in children with learning disabilities in reading versus spelling: Searching for overlapping and specific cognitive factors. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(6), 622-634. DOI: 10.1177/0022219414521665
Carretti, B., Caldarola, N., Tencati, C., & Cornoldi, C. (2014). Improving reading comprehension in reading and listening settings: The effect of two training programmes focusing on metacognition and working memory. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(2), 194-210. DOI: 10.1111/bjep.12022/full
Connor, C. M., Alberto, P. A., Compton, D. L., & O’Connor, R. E. (2014). Improving reading outcomes for students with or at risk for reading disabilities: A synthesis of the contributions from the institute of education sciences research centers. NCSER 2014-3000. National Center for Special Education Research. Retrieved from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED544759 18 April 2018.
Dirk, J., & Schmiedek, F. (2017). Variability in children’s working memory is coupled with perceived disturbance: An ambulatory assessment study in the school and out-of-school context. Research in Human Development, 14(3), 200-218. DOI: 10.1080/15427609.2017.1340051
Gathercole, S. E., Woolgar, F., Kievit, R. A., Astle, D., Manly, T., Holmes, J., & CALM Team. (2016). How common are WM deficits in children with difficulties in reading and mathematics? Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 5(4), 384-394. DOI: S2211368116301383
Malekpour, M., Aghababaei, S., & Abedi, A. (2013). Working memory and learning disabilities. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 59(1), 35-46. DOI: 10.1179/2047387711Y.0000000011
Melby-Lervåg, M., & Hulme, C. (2013). Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review. Developmental Psychology, 49(2), 270. Retrieved from: psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/2012-12954-001.html
Miller, A. C., Keenan, J. M., Betjemann, R. S., Willcutt, E. G., Pennington, B. F., & Olson, R. K. (2013). Reading comprehension in children with ADHD: Cognitive underpinnings of the centrality deficit. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41(3), 473-483.
Peng, P., & Fuchs, D. (2016). A meta-analysis of working memory deficits in children with learning difficulties: Is there a difference between verbal domain and numerical domain? Journal of learning disabilities, 49(1), 3-20. DOI: 10.1177/0022219414521667
Redick, T. S., Shipstead, Z., Wiemers, E. A., Melby-Lervåg, M., & Hulme, C. (2015). What’s working in working memory training? An educational perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 27(4), 617-633. DOI: 10.1007/s10648-015-9314-6