Law Enforcement Shifting Strategies after 9/11
Before the 9/11 attacks, law enforcement criminal intelligence focuses were on specific types of crimes such as organized crime, white collar crime, and gangs. Law enforcements spotlight has changed to also consist of the terrorists’ threats. Approximately 10 years subsequent to the 9/11 hit, the United States tolerated a more varied, lesser alarming, revolutionary intimidation than that of 2001.
Transformation concurrently took place in the federal government including the formation of fresh departments of homeland safety measures and changing priorities within the Federal agency of Investigation and other of the same bureaus. Prevention of potential operations of terrorism and training for huge rejoinder procedures developed into a national propriety immediately for all law enforcement bureaus. State-level preparation and technological backing for neighborhood agencies has increased since Sept. 11.in addition, Relationships within the private sector have generally increased, resulting in more state agency time and resources for these public-private activities. In the case of a bifurcated arrangement, one bureau normally offers interchange enforcement and restricted guard services, while a detached state agency examine specific categories of crimes. Florida, for example, has the Florida Highway Patrol and the Florida Department of Law Enforcement while California has the California Highway Patrol and the California Bureau of Investigation (Carter, 2004, pg.20). While practices differ significantly, bureaus offer widespread police services in countryside regions of the counties with an amalgamated arrangement.
One big disadvantage of the shifting law enforcement priorities was that the war on local crimes such as robberies, financial crimes, prearranged crimes and drug trafficks were unobserved. The federal agencies were no longer concerned. In addition the introduction of many police officers who provide service in the capital and National Guard continue to be encouraged for service in Afghanistan and Iraq thus introducing a huge staff tension on the states.
Carter, David L., Law Enforcement Intelligence a Guide for State, Local, and Tribal Law Enforcement Agencies, 2004. Retrieved April 2, 2014: http://www.intellprogram.msu.edu/Carter_Intelligence_Guide.pdf